Introduction
Adolescence is the stage of human development that
encompasses the transition between childhood and
adulthood. According to the World Health Organization
(WHO)1, adolescents are individuals aged 10 to 19 years.
From the perspective of Betty Neuman’s Systems Model2,
adolescents are considered complex, multidimensional, and
open systems, with a core structure composed of five
interactive variables—physiological, psychological,
sociocultural, developmental, and spiritual—which function
harmoniously in a state of well-being. Adolescence is
marked by significant changes across these dimensions,
which can be framed within three essential developmental
tasks: changes in relationships with parents (through
distancing and the pursuit of autonomy), changes in peer
relationships (through increased closeness and strengthened
bonds), and changes in self-perception and body image3.
Adolescence can be a critical period of heightened
psychological vulnerability. As a system in transition, the
adolescent is exposed to intrapersonal (internal),
interpersonal (immediate relationships such as family,
friends, and school peers), and extrapersonal (external but
indirectly affecting the adolescent, such as the broader
community) stressors, which may compromise well-being.
The adolescent’s response to stressors determines the
system’s stability or instability and, consequently, their
health status. This response depends on the defense lines
compromised by stressors and the system’s resilience.
According to Neuman2, the individual’s core structure is
surrounded by different concentric layers of protection,
which include the normal defense line (corresponding to the
usual level of well-being), the flexible defense line (which
shields against stressors, preventing the system from
reacting), and the resistance lines (activated when a stressor
breaches the normal defense line, posing a potentially fatal
threat due to its proximity to the core). Just as stressors can
affect any of these defense lines, the system’s response and
reconstitution can also occur at any level. If the system’s
response is positive, it tends toward balance, well-being, and
health; if negative, it shifts toward imbalance, leading to
illness and, ultimately, death2.
Suicide has emerged as a growing problem and is currently
the third leading cause of death in adolescence4. In Portugal,
in 2022, the suicide rate among individuals aged 15 to 24
reached its highest level in the past two decades. According
to the National Institute of Statistics (INE)5, the number of
deaths caused by intentional self-inflicted injuries reached
4.9 per 100,000 inhabitants, a significant increase compared
to the 3.2 recorded in the previous year. The WHO6 defines
suicide as the outcome of a deliberate act initiated and
carried out by an individual with full knowledge or
expectation of a fatal result. It is a complex, multifactorial
phenomenon resulting from the interaction of biological,
genetic, psychological, social, cultural, and environmental
factors7,3.
Suicidal behavior is not limited to completed suicide; it
encompasses a spectrum of thoughts (suicidal ideation) and
behaviors (suicide attempts), both of which are known to
potentially precipitate suicide3. It is understood as a gradual
process, beginning with suicidal ideation (thoughts, desire,
or plans for suicide, without necessarily leading to an
attempt), which may or may not progress to a suicide
attempt (a self-inflicted act with the intent to die that does
not result in death)7. Research indicates that each suicide
death is preceded, on average, by more than 20 suicide
attempts.8
According to the International Classification for Nursing
Practice (ICNP)9, suicidal behaviors are a priority focus in
nursing care. The NANDA-International10 classification of
nursing diagnoses includes Risk for Suicidal Behavior
(00298) within the Safety and Protection domain, defining
it as a “susceptibility to self-injurious behaviors associated
with some intent to die.” This diagnosis identifies
adolescents as a high-risk population and is linked to
several risk factors: psychological (low self-esteem,
depressive and anxiety symptoms), situational (access to
lethal means), social (dysfunctional family relationships,
peer pressure, social isolation), and behavioral (difficulty
expressing emotions, reluctance to seek help, and
impulsivity)10,11. In adolescence, most stressors are related
to interpersonal relationships (family and school) and
intrapersonal relationships (the adolescent’s self-
perception)3. From the perspective of Neuman’s Systems
Model, these risk factors can act as potential stressors on
the system.
Risk factors are counterbalanced by a set of protective
factors, referred to as reconstitution factors, which enhance
resilience and well-being. Protective factors against suicide
risk in adolescence may be intrapersonal (including
personal characteristics such as problem-solving ability,
willingness to seek help, sense of self-worth, and
engagement in life projects), interpersonal (such as positive,
supportive relationships with family and peers), or
extrapersonal (such as a positive school environment, easy
access to healthcare services, and effective coordination
with other social and community institutions)7. The
creation, maintenance, or reinforcement of these protective
factors is one of the main strategies for preventing suicide
in adolescence7.
Scientific evidence has supported a set of
recommendations for preventing suicidal behaviors,
including reducing access to lethal means, training primary
healthcare professionals, strengthening the connection
between community health services and mental health
services, developing broad multidisciplinary teams for
suicide prevention, training media professionals, and
increasing literacy to combat stigma surrounding mental
illness and suicidal behaviors.3
Ensuring safety has historically been the guiding principle of
psychiatric care, often justifying the institutionalization of
patients and the use of restrictive or oppressive measures
that were not always humane. However, in contemporary
mental health interventions, the concept of safety
promotion requires a broader perspective centered on the
continuous management of various risks, including suicide
risk12,13. Within the scope of this review, safety promotion
aligns with the principles of the Nursing Interventions
Classification (NIC)14, in which the safety promotion