Review Article
1
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
Nursing-led training of school staff to care for children and
adolescents with special health care needs: a scoping review
Mariana Marques1*, Débora Guerreiro2, Ana Bicho3, Sandra Xavier4
1 Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; orcid.org/0009-0004-3416-2398
2 Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; orcid.org/0009-0002-8861-4535
3 Unidade Local de Saúde Amadora-Sintra, Unidade de Saúde Pública, Amadora, Lisboa, Portugal; orcid.org/0009-0003-6826-386X
4 Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; orcid.org/0000-0001-6676-268X
* Corresponding author: mmarques2@campus.esel.pt
Received: 15.03.2025
Accepted: 06.11.2025
Editor: Luís Sousa
How to cite this article: Marques M, Guerreiro D, Bicho A, Xavier S. Nursing-led training of school staff to care for children and adolescents with special
health care needs: a scoping review. Pensar Enf [Internet]. 2025 Jan-Dec; 29(1): e00430. Available from: https://doi.org/10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430
Abstract
Introduction
Children and adolescents with special health care needs (SHCN) live with chronic physical and developmental
conditions that affect functioning and require ongoing support from health systems. Nurses work throughout
the lifespan and across various care settings; they are well positioned to provide health education and deliver
specialized care to individuals, groups, and communities, leading to improvements in health outcomes.
Objective
To map the scientific evidence on training school staff to care for children and adolescents with SHCN in
school settings.
Methods
We carried out a scoping review in line with Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance and the PCC framework
(Participants, Concept, Context). Studies were identified from six international databases between May and
June 2024. Study selection followed the PRISMA-ScR checklist (EQUATOR Network); three independent
reviewers performed the data charting and analysis.
Results
This scoping review included three articles published between 2015 and 2020. Data were charted according to
the main domains of the A-FROM tool. The nursing interventions reported aimed to train school staff through
health education sessions and practice-based activities to build knowledge and competencies.
Conclusion
Nursing-led training for school staff caring for children and adolescents with SHCN showed positive effects
on knowledge regarding the targeted needs, confidence in care, and children’s quality of life. Continued research
and reporting of nursing interventions that train school staff to care for children and adolescents with SHCN
in school settings are essential.
Keywords
Students; School Health Promotion; Nursing; Staff Training.
Introduction
The Alma-Ata Conference in the 1970s was the pioneering conference on primary health care; it addressed
strategies for health promotion and highlighted the relevance of the social determinants of health. Subsequently,
in 1986, the first International Conference on Health Promotion was held in Ottawa. In addition to contributing
Review Article
2
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
to the goal of Health for All by the year 2000, it responded to growing expectations for a renewal of public
health. It also established a commitment to health promotion, defined as the process of enabling individuals,
groups, and communities to participate and increase control over their health, thereby improving their health
and quality of life.1,2
Portugal has been part of the Schools for Health in Europe (SHE) network since 1994, a World Health
Organizationguided European online platform that brings together schools and organizations to create a
supportive environment for promoting health and well-being among children and adolescents, thereby
improving both health and educational outcomes.3
The National Health Plan 2030 holds that health is a responsibility of society as a whole and that health
promotion applies across all the settings where communities live, work, and learn. A core strategic choice is to
invest in the social determinants of health and well-being by strengthening protective factors, reducingor
even eliminatingrisk factors, and at the same time ensuring the engagement and commitment of all
stakeholders to health outcomes. Accordingly, one specific setting for intervention is schools, as the health of
children and adolescents is influenced by the environments in which they grow, learn, and develop throughout
their school years.4,5
In 2022, Portugal had 1,591,865 students enrolled in preschool; the first, second, and third cycles of basic
education; secondary education; and career and technical education (CTE) programs.6 In the 2021/2022 school
year, the number of non-tertiary educational institutions in Portugal was 8,199.7
All children and adolescents have the right to health and to education. The school community plays a central
role in promoting and maintaining the health and well-being of children and adolescents, given its proximity to
these age groups; it is essential to build local, regional, and national networks, alliances, and partnerships
committed to the school community to address identified needs.4
School health interventions encompass the entire school communitystudents, school staff, and
parents/guardiansand contribute to improving the quality of the school environment and minimizing health
risks; promoting healthy lifestyles and raising health literacy; and promoting health, preventing disease, and
reducing the impact of health problems on students’ academic performance.4
One of the strategic pillars of the 2015 National School Health Program is capacity-building within the school
community and raising health literacy regarding health conditions, specifically in areas related to special health
care needs (SHCN). School health teams, in coordination with schools and families, are responsible for
identifying, screening, referring, and supporting children or adolescents with SHCN.4
SHCN are defined as “those resulting from health problems that affect functioning and require intervention in
the school setting, such as irregular attendance or the need for special conditions to attend school, and a
negative impact on learning or individual development.”4(p.43) They include chronic diseases, disability,
developmental disorders, and emotional and behavioral disorders, among others.
According to the report Health of Portuguese Adolescents in the Context of the Pandemic, in 2022, 18.6% of
students in Portugal reported a long-term illness, corresponding to 5,809 students. The most frequently
reported diagnosis was allergies, accounting for 49.8% of students with a long-term illness, followed by reduced
visual acuity (35.2%), asthma (27.4%), and mental health conditions (about 10.7%). Additionally, among
students with a long-term illness, 3.8% had heart disease, 2.8% had obesity, 2% had diabetes, and 1.6% had
epilepsy.8
The presence of a long-term illness affects students’ quality of life: 54.5% need to take medication; 29.1% report
effects on participation in leisure activities; 27.2% mention problems with school attendance and participation;
and 12.5% report needing special equipment such as a blood glucose meter, forearm crutches, a wheelchair, or
an adapted computer.8
In addition to the impact on learning, these students require an appropriate response to their SHCN. This
observation underscores the importance of nursing-led training for school staff to care for these students,
providing the school community with initiatives that promote and protect health, build capacity for self-care
and care for others, and prevent disease and disability.4,9
Nurses play an important role in achieving the goals of the National Health Plan and in implementing the
National School Health Program; working in partnership with schools and families, their practice aligns with
these initiatives’ strategic priorities.10
Review Article
3
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
Nurses are well positioned to promote and maintain health and to build the school community’s capacity to
identify and address its problems from a holistic perspective. They recognize the potential of health education
within nursing interventions and apply the nursing process to strengthen community capacity.10
Accordingly, nurses implement strategies in, with, and for the communityworking with partner
organizations—to enable the community to promote health and improve health outcomes. Thus, nursing’s
agenda embraces the following Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): SDG 3, good health and well-being;
SDG 4, quality education; SDG 10, reduced inequalities; and SDG 17, partnerships for the goals.11
Despite growing recognition of the importance of training school staff in school health, the literature lacks
comprehensive scoping reviews on this topic. A preliminary search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus did
not identify recent reviews specifically focused on training across multiple SHCN-related conditions. This
finding underscores the relevance of the present review as a contribution to organizing the evidence and
informing good practices in school settings.
The main objective of this scoping review is to map the available scientific evidence on training school staff to
care for children and adolescents with SHCN in school settings.
Methods
A scoping review is a methodological approach for synthesizing available scientific evidence using a rigorous
and efficient process. The main objectives are to map existing evidence in a research area, identify gaps, and
provide a preliminary exercise that justifies and informs a subsequent systematic review.12
A distinctive feature of scoping review methodology is that it typically does not assess the methodological
quality of included studies, since the aim is to map existing evidence rather than locate the best evidence.12
This review followed JBI methodology and was guided by the question: “Which nursing interventions provide
training for school staff caring for children and adolescents with special health care needs in school settings?”
It was framed using the PCC framework, which organizes the question into three elements: PParticipants
(school staff); CConcept (nursing-led training for school staff); and CContext (school settings). This study
adheres to the PRISMA-ScR checklist (EQUATOR Network).12
The protocol for this scoping review is registered on the Open Science Framework and is available at:
https://osf.io/gbcs3.
Eligibility criteria
After formulating the question and defining the objective, inclusion and exclusion criteria were established and
applied to guide the search and subsequent study selection.
Study inclusion criteria:
Participants: school staff, with no restrictions on sex, ethnicity, or personal characteristics
Concept: nursing-led training interventions for caring for children/adolescents with special health care needs
(SHCN). The International Council of Nurses (2001) defines a nursing intervention as “an action carried out
in response to a nursing diagnosis to achieve a nursing outcome,” as cited by the Portuguese Order of
Nurses.13(p15)
Context: the school community, regardless of the educational institution’s geographic location, and whether
the institution is public or private, general or specialized, urban or rural.
Source types: primary studies with quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods designs; theoretical articles;
literature reviews; and gray literaturenamely dissertations and thesesin English, Spanish, or Portuguese,
regardless of year of publication, with only sources available in full text included.
Exclusion criteria:
Participants: children, adolescents, and families;
Concept: studies addressing special educational needs were excluded. The World Health Organization (2011),
as cited by the Directorate-General for Education and Science Statistics,14(p.?) defines special educational needs
as “a set of significant limitations in one or more domains of life activity and participation resulting from
Review Article
4
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
permanent functional and structural impairments, leading to ongoing difficulties in communication, learning,
mobility, autonomy, interpersonal relationships, and social participation.”.
Information sources and search strategy
The literature search was carried out between May 18 and June 2, 2024, following JBI’s three-step process for
developing a comprehensive search strategy.12
The first step consisted of identifying the keywords most frequently used in the titles and abstracts of retrieved
papers, as well as the indexing terms used in the literature. To this end, a preliminary search was conducted
using natural-language terms in MEDLINE (via EBSCO) and CINAHL Complete (via EBSCO). The titles and
keywords were analyzed to identify relevant search terms for this scoping review.
Next, a complete and customized search strategy was implemented in MEDLINE (via EBSCO) and CINAHL
Complete (via EBSCO). This strategy was adapted to each database, using natural-language search terms, DeCS
and MeSH indexing terms, and truncations applied to the title, abstract, and MH Exact MeSH Subject Heading
fields. Boolean operators OR and AND were used as detailed in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1. Search strategy used in the MEDLINE Ultimate database (via EBSCO) on May 21, 2024
ID
Search strategy
Results
S1
TI child* OR AB child*
1,705,663
S2
TI teen* OR AB teen*
36,359
S3
TI school OR AB school
344,820
S4
TI “special needs” OR AB “special needs”
4,809
S5
TI nurs* OR AB nurs*
542,580
S6
S1 OR S2
1,731,003
S7
(S1 OR S2) AND S3 AND S4 AND S5
63
S8
S7 AND TEXTO INTEGRAL [Filter]
11
S – search line; * – truncation
Table 2. Search strategy used in the CINAHL Complete database (via EBSCO) on May 21, 2024
ID
Search strategy
Results
S1
TI child* OR AB child* OR MH child*
899,443
S2
TI teen* OR AB teen* OR MH teen*
21,241
S3
TI school OR AB school OR MH school
166,646
S4
TI “special needs” OR AB “special needs” OR MH “special needs”
4,140
S5
TI nurs* OR AB nurs* OR MH nurs*
795,513
S6
S1 OR S2
913,677
S7
(S1 OR S2) AND S3 AND S4 AND S5
78
S8
S7 AND TEXTO INTEGRAL [Filter]
34
S – search line; * – truncation
In the second search, all identified keywords and index terms were applied across all included databases,
specifically SCOPUS, JBI EBP Database on Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SciELO
(Tables 3 to 6).
Table 3. Search strategy used in the SCOPUS database on June 2, 2024
ID
Search strategy
Results
S1
child* (article title, abstract, keywords)
3,956,287
S2
teen* (article title, abstract, keywords)
21,340
S3
school (article title, abstract, keywords)
463,745
S4
“Health care needs” (article title, abstract, keywords)
17,038
S5
nurs* (article title, abstract, keywords)
219,947
Review Article
5
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
S6
S1 OR S2
1,176,662
S7
(S1 OR S2) AND S3 AND S4 AND S5
54
S8
S7 AND TEXTO INTEGRAL [Filter]
53
S search line; * truncation
Table 4. Search strategy used in the JBI EBP Database on Ovid on June 2, 2024
ID
Search strategy
Results
S1
child* mp
2,580
S2
teen* mp
163
S3
school mp
1,378
S4
“Health care needs” mp
60
S5
nurs* mp
7,141
S6
S1 OR S2
2,595
S7
(S1 OR S2) AND S3 AND S4 AND S5
21
S8
S7 AND TEXTO INTEGRAL [Filter]
10
S search line; * truncation
Table 5 – Search strategy used in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database on June 2, 2024
ID
Search strategy
Results
S1
TI child* OR AB child* OR MH child*
196,412
S2
TI teen* OR AB teen* OR MH teen*
3,750
S3
TI school OR AB school OR MH school
12,776
S4
TI “special needs” OR AB “special needs” OR MH “special needs”
314
S5
TI nurs* OR AB nurs* OR MH nurs*
54,232
S6
S1 OR S2
198,926
S7
(S1 OR S2) AND S3 AND S4 AND S5
6
S8
S7 AND TEXTO INTEGRAL [Filter]
2
S search line; * truncation
Table 6 – Search strategy used in the SciELO database on June 2, 2024
ID
Search strategy
Results
S1
(ab:(necessidades de saúde especiais)) OR (ti:(necessidades de saúde
especiais ))
153
S2
(ti:(escola)) OR (ab:(escola))
9,202
S3
(ti:(crianças)) OR (ab:(crianças))
16,737
S4
(ab:(enfermagem)) OR (ab:(enfermagem))
9,390
S5
S1 AND S2 AND S3 AND S4
0
S6
S5 AND TEXTO INTEGRAL [Filter]
0
S search line; * truncation
Finally, in the third step, the reference lists of all articles and studies selected for inclusion were reviewed to
identify additional studies potentially relevant for answering the review question.
Selection of sources of evidence
Search results from the different databases were exported, compiled, and managedfirst in Zotero 6 for Mac,
then in Rayyan Intelligent Systematic Review to organize and remove duplicate records. Study selection
followed the inclusion and exclusion criteria established for this review. Titles and abstracts were initially
screened, followed by a full-text reading of potentially eligible studies to verify their relevance and suitability
according to the review question. Studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. Two reviewers
Review Article
6
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
independently selected the sources of evidence, and any discrepancies regarding inclusion or exclusion were
resolved by consensus.
Data charting and synthesis of results
To extract relevant information from the studies included in the review, a data charting instrument (table) was
developed in Microsoft Word, based on JBI guidance, to ensure detailed organization and synthesis of relevant
information for each study. These tables contained information on the title, author(s), year of publication,
country of origin, methodology, objectives, population/sample, nursing intervention, and context.12
Results
This section is organized into three subsections: selection of sources of evidence, characteristics of the included
studies, and synthesis of results, each accompanied by summary tables of the analyzed studies.12
Selection of sources of evidence
A total of 110 potentially relevant articles were identified through database searches. Thirteen duplicates were
removed, leaving 97 records. Titles and abstracts of these 97 records were screened; 85 did not meet the
inclusion criteria, and 12 proceeded to full-text review. Of the 12 full-text articles assessed, 10 were excluded:
two did not address the context, four did not involve the target population, and four did not include nursing
interventions. Additional records were identified through citation searching. Of the 123 articles listed in the
reference lists consulted, 20 were selected for full-text review; 17 did not address the review question, and one
was not available in full text. At the end of this process, three articles were included in this scoping review, as
shown in Figure 1.12
Characteristics of the included studies
Three articles published between 2015 and 2020 were included. One study was conducted in New Jersey, United
States, using a literature review design, although the methodology was not explicitly described. The second
study, carried out in California, followed a systematic literature review approach. The third study was conducted
in Egypt and used a quantitative quasi-experimental design.15,16,17
Across all included studies, nursing interventions targeting school staff (teaching and non-teaching) consisted
of training programs aiming at caring for children with SHCN.15,16,17
It was difficult to identify studies in which nursing-led training was directed exclusively to school staff (teachers
and non-teaching personnel). This fact may reflect school settings where a school nurseemployed by the
institutionassumes primary responsibility for caring for students with SHCN as part of routine duties. Among
the reviewed studies, only one specified the children’s age group (preschool), and only one reported the
intervention period, without specifying duration or frequency.15,16,17
The preschool-focused study described nursing-led training for school staff addressing several SHCN-related
conditions in children, specifically asthma, type 1 diabetes, food allergies, and seizures. The remaining studies
involved adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).15,16,17
Synthesis of results
Findings demonstrate nursing-led training designed to develop teachers’ and school staff’s knowledge and skills
for caring for students with SHCN. Tables 7, 8, and 9 present the extracted results and align them with the
review question and objectives.
Review Article
7
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
Figure 1 Study selection flow diagram adapted from PRISMA 2020.
Table 7. Data charting from the article “Caring for the youngest students”15
Title
Author(s)
Michelle Lynn
Caring for the
youngest students
Year of publication
2020
Country of origin
New Jersey, United States
Methodology
The literature review methodology was not explicitly described.
Objective
To identify school nurses’ interventions for preschool-aged children with
SHCN.
Population/sample
Staff of preschool institutions caring for children with SHCN
Intervention
Nursing interventions are presented for the following chronic conditions:
asthma, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, and food allergies. For each condition, the
nursing diagnoses and corresponding nursing interventions are specified.
Interventions directed to teaching and non-teaching staff aim to build capacity
to care for children with SHCN. Core elements of the training include
preventing complications related to these conditions, recognizing signs and
symptoms, and preparing staff to provide a rapid, effective response to
school-based emergencies. Another intervention described is the development
of an Emergency Action Plan (EAP) to be used by school staff in such
situations.
Results
With the implementation of nursing-led training for preschool staff tailored to
each condition and the creation of Emergency Action Plans (EAPs), the
school health team expects outcomes such as the prompt and effective
recognition of signs and symptoms of asthma exacerbations, hypoglycemia,
hyperglycemia, anaphylaxis, and seizures. Subsequently, each staff member
should be able to identify their role and coordinate during emergencies to
prevent more serious problems and achieve improvements in health outcomes
for children with SHCN. Finally, health-promotion actions envisage an
inclusive school in which children with SHCN can participate in the same
activities—or in adaptations appropriate to their health condition—without
adverse impact on their condition.
Review Article
8
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
Table 8. Data charting from the article “School-based diabetes interventions and their outcomes”16
Title
Author(s)
Peter Schulz e Bénédicte Pansier
School-based
diabetes
interventions and
their outcomes
Year of publication
2015
Country of origin
Switzerland
Methodology
Systematic literature review
Objective
To determine effective school-based interventions to improve health, quality
of life, and academic outcomes in children with diabetes mellitus.
Population/sample
School staff
Intervention
Fifteen primary studies in English (2000–2013) were included. Group 1
(7 studies) focused on educating school staff; Group 2 targeted children with
diabetes to improve health, school performance, and well-being.
Staff-focused interventions were delivered via educational programs,
continuing education, online modules, CD-ROM materials, and the
development of resources for school staff.
Results
Staff-directed interventions were evaluated using quantitative and qualitative
assessments of knowledge gains, satisfaction, and perceived competence and
confidence in caring for children with type 1 diabetes; child outcomes included
quality of life and HbA1c. Designs included pre-/post-assessments and
longitudinal follow-ups. Programs for teachers and non-teaching staff showed
significant improvements in diabetes knowledge following the training (e.g.,
p < 0.033; p < 0.004; p < 0.001).
Table 9. Data charting from the article “Evaluation of the impact of a diabetes education eLearning
program for school personnel on diabetes knowledge, knowledge retention and confidence in caring for
students with diabetes”17
Title
Author(s)
Taha et al.
Evaluation of the
impact of a diabetes
education
eLearning program
for school personnel
on diabetes
knowledge,
knowledge retention
and confidence in
caring for students
with diabetes
Year of publication
2018
Country of origin
Egypt
Methodology
Quantitative quasi-experimental study
Objective
To evaluate the impact of a diabetes eLearning education program—
focused on knowledge and practices for school sta—and to provide a
supportive environment for caring for students with diabetes mellitus.
Population/sample
School health nurses, teachers, and psychologists
Intervention
The intervention comprised three components: knowledge modules, a
skills workshop, and a toolkit with recommendations and resources.
Knowledge content was delivered via an interactive eLearning program.
Eectiveness was assessed using pre- and post-intervention diabetes-
knowledge questionnaires; knowledge and condence were also
evaluated at 6 or 12 months, with half of the sample assessed at 6
months and the other half at 12 months.
Results
A total of 124 public school sta members participated. After the
eLearning intervention, diabetes knowledge increased signicantly
versus baseline (p < 0.0001) on immediate testing and at 6 months [96
participants (77%) retained knowledge] and 12 months [43 participants
(55%) retained knowledge]. At the end of the intervention, the mean
condence score was 61.86% across all seven items assessed in the
questionnaire on caring for children with diabetes mellitus. In addition,
51.1% reported condence in their diabetes knowledge, and 57.4%
reported condence in adequately caring for a child with diabetes
mellitus. Regarding the use of a blood glucose meter, 71.3% reported
condence, and 67% reported condence in treating hypoglycemia.
Review Article
9
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
Discussion
Summary of the evidence
Nurses’ interventions were valued across all included studies, making relevant contributions to teachers and
other school staff and, consequently, to children with SHCN. The findings of this scoping review identify the
main areas of practice and the nursing interventions delivered in school settings, essentially aligned with training
for school staff who care for children with SHCN.15,16,17
All T1D-focused studies were conducted in schools, and the study encompassing other conditions was carried
out in a preschool institution.16,17,15 According to Lynn, care provided by teaching and non-teaching staff to
preschool children is more demanding than for older children. This article addressed, in addition to training for
T1D management, interventions related to asthma, food allergies, and seizures.15
Regarding asthma, Lynn notes that preschool children have difficulty expressing symptoms during an
exacerbation. Nurses play an active role in training school staff; therefore, nurses need to indicate each student’s
asthma severity and sensitize staff to early manifestations of an attack. The team must recognize signs and
symptoms that require immediate rescue medication.15
Barros identified the greatest health literacy gaps among school staff caring for children with asthma, specifically
in the clinical aspects of the disease, etiopathophysiology, and therapy. After online sessions on triggers,
therapeutic regimen management, and crisis management, delivered within a training project for preschool and
early-elementary caregivers, there was a significant increase in knowledge among teachers and non-teaching
staff (p < 0.001), demonstrating the program’s effectiveness.18 The Directorate-General of Health states that
training for asthma should focus on acquiring knowledge about the disease process, signs and symptoms, early
recognition of exacerbations, adherence to pharmacologic treatment, and skills for correct use and adherence
to controller therapy, such as inhaled therapy.19
For food allergies, in addition to the asthma-like challenge that preschool children may be unable to verbalize
symptoms of an anaphylactic reaction, the same author notes that preschoolers often explore the classroom
environment and may inadvertently ingest food residues there. Hence, the relevance of nursing-led training for
school staff to identify signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis. In the event of an anaphylactic crisis, all staff should
have the knowledge and skills acquired through health-education actions, an Emergency Action Plan, and the
immediate administration of the indicated therapy (epinephrine), required for this situation.15
Regarding seizures, the emphasis again is on nursing-led training for staff in preschool settings, with a focus on
primary prevention. To complement training, the nursing team should train staff in first aid and provide the
skills needed to manage seizure emergencies.15
All studies included in this review mention nursing interventions that build the capacity of school staff to care
for children with T1D, both in preschool settings and across other school ages.15,16,17
No differences were observed in the types of nursing interventions for preschoolers versus older students with
T1D. The interventions aimed to improve health, quality of life, and academic outcomes by training school
staff through multiple formats, including in-person and online educational programs. Statistically significant
improvements were observed in knowledge and skills, in participants’ perceived confidence to care for children
with T1D, and in children’s quality of life after the interventions.16
Similar findingssignificant increases in diabetes knowledge and confidence in caring for children with T1D
were reported by Taha et al. following an eLearning program complemented by hands-on sessions.
Gonçalves implemented three health-education sessions for teachers and two for non-teaching staff, achieving
the impact indicators and demonstrating higher knowledge levels; the educational content across the three cited
studies was comparable.17,20
However, Taha et al. was the only study to include longer-term follow-up (6 and 12 months), showing positive
knowledge retention related to T1D. Lynn described the training content for preschool educators, but did not
report outcomes or impact.17,15
By contrast, Belourico reported improvements in knowledge, confidence, and quality of life among preschool
children with T1D after delivering one online health-education session and one in-person practical session to
preschool teachers and classroom assistants. These sessions included opportunities to handle and simulate
insulin and glucagon administration techniques, as well as capillary blood glucose monitoring.
Review Article
10
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
SHCN have numerous physical, emotional, and socioeconomic impacts, placing a substantial burden on
children and their communities. To ensure adequate management of SHCN, school staff should be engaged in
promoting health and students’ quality of life. Accordingly, across the studies, health promotion, health
education, and training for school staff caring for children with SHCN were prioritized to support self-
management and reduce costs, exacerbations, hospital admissions, and absenteeism from school and work.18
The data synthesized in this review underscore the strategic role of nurses in promoting health in school
settings. For practice, there is a need for ongoing educational programs for school staff. At the policy level,
capacity-building within school systems should structurally integrate nurses into school contexts. For research,
gaps remain in longitudinal, multicenter, and experimental studies that evaluate the effectiveness and
sustainability of these interventions over the long term.
Conclusion
This scoping review aimed to analyze and map nursing interventions in school settings that train school staff
to care for children and adolescents with SHCN. Three studies were included, differing in implementation type
and duration. All studies trained teaching and non-teaching staff who care for children and adolescents with
SHCN, and one extended the interventions to psychologists and school nurses.
Addressing these gaps will require primary, experimental, and longer-duration studies with larger samples and
broader geographic coverage. In addition, research should examine outcome selection and long-term evaluation
methods to refine and improve school-based interventions. The studies included here, together with subsequent
investigations, can inform health and school policies that improve health outcomes.
Study limitations
This review included only articles published in English, Portuguese, and Spanish. Including articles in other
languages could strengthen the review. Conducting a methodological appraisal of the included studies would
also be relevant, although it is not required in scoping review methodology.
Authorship and Contributions
MM: Contextualization, methodology, software, writing (original draft), writing (analysis and interpretation),
first independent reviewer, final approval of manuscript, assumption of responsibility.
GD: Software, writing (analysis and interpretation of data), second independent reviewer, approval of final
version of manuscript, assumption of responsibility.
BA: Validation, writing (analysis and editing), third independent reviewer, critical review, approval of the final
version of the manuscript, assumption of responsibility.
XS: Validation, critical review, approval of the final version of the manuscript, assumption of responsibility.
Conflicts of interest and Funding
No conflicts of interest were declared by the authors.
Sources of support / Financing
The study was not funded.
References
1Portugal. Ministério da Saúde. Semantica da Informaco em Sade. [Internet]. Direção-Geral da Saúde (DGS),
editor. 2017 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em:
https://comum.rcaap.pt/bitstream/10400.26/22501/1/Semantica%20da%20Informac
o%20em%20Sade%202017.pdf
2Hartmann C, Lopes G, Vieira F, Samuel B. História da promoção da saúde e a "Carta de Ottawa descrita na
íntegra". Int Revista Científica Cognitionis [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em:
https://www.passeidireto.com/arquivo/98751927/historia-da-promocao-da-saude-e-a-carta-de-
ottawa-descrita-na-integra
3Bélgica. Schools for Health in Europe. 2021 In Focus: Schools Health in Europe Network foundation
[Internet]. Editor. 2021 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em:
https://www.schoolsforhealth.org/sites/default/files/editor/SHE-leaflet-2021-screen.pdf
Review Article
11
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
4Portugal. Ministério da Saúde. Programa Nacional de Saúde Escolar 2015 [Internet]. Direção-Geral da Saúde
(DGS), editor. 2015 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em: https://www.arsnorte.min-saude.pt/wp-
content/uploads/sites/3/2018/01/Programa_NSE_2015.pdf
5Portugal. Ministério da Saúde. Plano Nacional de Sade 2021-2030. [Internet]. Direção-Geral da Saúde (DGS),
editor. 2021 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em: https://www.dgs.pt/documentos-em-discussao-
publica/plano- nacional-de-saude-2021-2030-em-consulta-publica-ate-7-de- maio1.aspx
6Portugal. PORDATA. Alunos Matriculados nos ensinos pré-escolar, básico e secundário por nível de ensino
[Internet]. Editor. 2024 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em:
https://www.pordata.pt/municipios/alunos+matriculados+nos+ensinos+pre+escolar++basic
o+e+secundario+total+e+por+nivel+de+ensino-166
7Portugal. Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Estabelecimentos de ensino não superior (N.º) por localização
geográfica, nível de ensino e natureza institucional, anual [Internet]. Editor, 2023 [citado 2024 maio 22].
Disponível em:
https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_indicadores&indOcorrCod=000109
7&xlang=pt&contexto=bd&selTab=tab2
8Portugal. Ministério da Saúde. A saúde dos adolescentes portugueses em contexto de pandemia. [Internet].
Direção-Geral da Saúde (DGS), editor. 2022 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em:
https://aventurasocial.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HBSC_RelatórioNacional_2022.pdf
9Portugal. Ministério da Saúde. Programa de apoio à promoção e educação para a saúde. [Internet]. Direção-
Geral da Saúde (DGS), editor. 2023 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em:
https://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/Esaude/papes_doc.pdf
10Portugal. Ordem dos Enfermeiros. Regulamento do perfil de competências do enfermeiro de cuidados gerais
[Internet]. Editor. 2011 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em:
https://www.ordemenfermeiros.pt/media/8910/divulgar-regulamento-do-perfil_vf.pdf
11Suiça. Organização Mundial de Saúde. The 2030 agenda for sustainable development [Internet]. Editor, 2015
[citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em:
https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/glob
alcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf
12Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco A, Khalil H, editors. Scoping Reviews
[Internet]: E. Aromataris, C. Lockwood, K. Porritt, B. Pilla, & Z. Jordan; 2020 [atualizado em
2024]. Capítulo 10, JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis; [citado 2024 maio 22]; Disponível em:
https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/355862497/10.+Scoping+reviews
13Portugal. Ordem dos Enfermeiros. Linhas de Orientação para a elaboração de catálogos CIPE [Internet].
Editor. 2009 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em:
https://www.ordemenfermeiros.pt/arquivo/publicacoes/Documents/linhas_cipe.pdf
14Portugal. Ministério da Educação. Inquérito às instituições de Ensino Superior e respetivas Unidades
Orgânicas sobre necessidades educativas especiais 2018/19 [Internet]. Direção Geral de Estatísticas da
Educação e da Ciência, editor. 2019 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://wwwcdn.dges.gov.
pt/sites/default/files/dgeec_dsee_dees_neees_ies_20182019.xlsx&ved=2ahUKEwi-j7-
t35qGAxU1BfsDHWzrByMQFnoECCsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0ms12FRCoRSelIfGaJJSYm
15Lynn M. Caring of the youngest students: The ABCs of preschool Nursing. Int NASN School Nurse
[Internet]. 2020 May [citado 2024 julho 1]; 35(3); 147-151. Disponível em:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31983288/
16Schulz P, Pansier, B. School-based diabetes interventions and their outcomes: a systematic literature
review. Int Journal of public health research [Internet]. 2015 Apr [citado 2024 julho 1]; 4(1). 65-71.
Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25918699/
17Taha N, Rahme Z, Mesbah N, Mahmoud F, AlKandi S, Othman N, et al. Evaluation of the impact of a
diabetes education eLearning program for school personnel on diabetes knowledge, knowledge retention
Review Article
12
Pensar Enfermagem / v.29 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2025 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v29i1.430 / e00430
and confidence in caring for students with diabetes. Int Diabetes Research Clinical Practice [Internet].
2018[citado em 2024 julho 1]. 139. 348-356. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29574107/
18Barros L. Empoderamento de cuidadores de crianças com asma em contexto escolar: implementação e
avaliação do projeto ECCA [dissertação na internet]. Viana do Castelo (Portugal): Escola Superior de Saúde;
2021[citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível em:
http://repositorio.ipvc.pt/bitstream/20.500.11960/2554/1/Lucinda_Manuela_Barros.pdf
19Portugal. Ministério da Saúde. Norma nº 012/2018 de 12 de junho: Processo Assistencial Integrado da Asma
na Criança e no Adulto. [Internet]. Direção-Geral da Saúde (DGS), editor. 2017 [citado 2024 maio 22].
Disponível em: https://www.dgs.pt/directrizes-da-dgs/normas-e-circulares-normativas/norma-n-
0122018-de-12062018-pdf.aspx
20Gonçalves S. A criança, a Diabetes e a Escola Capacitação de Professores e Profissionais não docentes
[dissertação na internet]. Setúbal (Portugal): Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal; 2019 [citado 2024 maio 22].
Disponível em: https://repositorio.ipbeja.pt/entities/publication/38138fa2-51d3-4a60-9377-
e9f8d083b25f
21Belourico C. Projeto de intervenção comunitária: a criança com diabetes no ensino pré-escolar [dissertação
na internet]. Lisboa (Portugal): Universidade Católica Portuguesa; 2022 [citado 2024 maio 22]. Disponível
em: https://repositorio.ucp.pt/bitstream/10400.14/44585/1/203539583.pdf