Qualitative Original Article
3
Pensar Enfermagem / v.30 n.01 / Jan-Dec 2026 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v30i1.443 / e00443
The inclusion criteria were as follows: being in the second trimester of pregnancy or at a more advanced stage;
presenting common discomforts associated with pregnancy; being aged 18 years or over; and having full mental
capacity to answer the questions during data collection adequately.
With regard to the exclusion criteria, participants who missed any of the sessions were deemed ineligible, as
were those with a documented history of contact allergy to the adhesives employed in Auriculotherapy, those
who developed auricular inflammation, or those presenting congenital malformations of the auricle, such as
microtia or anotia, characterised by unilateral or bilateral underdevelopment of the auricular structure.
In total, 25 participants who agreed to take part in the study were included, of whom 17 were in Brazil and 8
in Portugal. The difference in the number of participants between Brazil and Portugal is attributable to the
number of available and eligible participants at each site who consented to take part, with theoretical data
saturation having been achieved.
Initially, the study objectives, potential benefits and risks, and the procedures related to the intervention were
explained to the participating pregnant women. Subsequently, those who agreed to participate provided written
informed consent.
Prior to the intervention, each participant completed a semi-structured form, which included questions for
sociodemographic characterisation, obstetric profile and identification of gestational discomforts.
The intervention was carried out weekly over four weeks. At each session, the pregnant woman’s perception
of the discomforts previously reported was assessed before the application of Auriculotherapy, and a field diary
was used to record her emotional state.
The Auriculotherapy technique was applied using black mustard seeds, positioned at specific auricular points
corresponding to the discomforts reported, in accordance with auricular point protocols previously developed
by the principal investigator, a specialist in TCM and Obstetric Nursing. These protocols were defined for the
following gestational discomforts: anxiety (and/or stress), low self-esteem (and/or physical fatigue, emotional
instability, mood swings), cramps, headaches, oedema, heartburn.
In each procedure, the participants’ ears were previously cleansed with 70% alcohol. Based on the auricular
map6, the anatomical regions indicated therein were used as reference points. However, as in any auricular
point location process, a stainless steel probe was used to identify the sites compatible with the adopted
protocol. This process of identifying sensitivity was carried out on both ears of the participant.
By applying gentle and continuous pressure to the corresponding region of the pregnant woman’s ear, the
mustard seed was fixed with adhesive at the point considered most sensitive to palpation, according to the
participant’s own perception. After placement, a circular massage was performed at each point, at least three
times, gently yet firmly, to ensure adequate adhesion. The participant was expected to experience slight
discomfort during the procedure, thereby confirming the correct localisation of the reactive point.
During each session, the participants received guidance on the necessary care: to perform gentle massage on
the seed points at least three times a day; to exercise caution during bathing to prevent detachment of the
adhesives protecting the seeds; to use cotton wool soaked in 70% alcohol to maintain local hygiene; and to
remove the adhesives with the seeds between the fifth and seventh day of use.
In the fifth week, each pregnant woman responded to the guiding question included in the second part of the
semi-structured form: "What was it like for you to have been treated with the Auriculotherapy technique in
relation to the discomforts you reported at the beginning of the investigation?"
Of note, given the pandemic context between 2020 and 2022, careful organisation of participant appointments
was required in both Brazil and Portugal throughout the data collection period.
Quantitative data were analysed descriptively using absolute frequencies. The qualitative data were analysed
using Bardin’s content analysis7, thereby identifying two main categories and their respective subcategories. To
safeguard the credibility and rigour of the qualitative analysis, multiple researchers were involved in the
analytical process to mitigate individual bias.
To organise and present the study categories, participants were identified from G1 to G25, distinguishing the
pregnant women from Brazil (G1B–G17B) and from Portugal (G18P–G25P).
Results
Regarding the participants’ profile (Table 1), the majority were married, had higher education, were aged between
28 and 32 years, were employed and had a low family income. With respect to the obstetric profile, most were
in their first pregnancy, in the third trimester, and had not planned the current pregnancy; the participants
reported satisfaction with the current pregnancy, and the most frequently reported discomforts were stress,
anxiety and lower back pain.