Abstract

Pensar Enfermagem / v.30 n.Sup / Jan-Dec 2026 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v30iSup.489 / e00489

Co-Design in Social Prescribing Interventions for Older Adults:

Insights from a Systematic Review

Susana Sul1*, Adriana Henriques2, Paulo Santos Costa3, Andreia Costa4

1 Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), School of Nursing, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Prof. Egas

Moniz, 1600-190 Lisbon, Portugal; orcid.org/0000-0002-6969-0287

2 Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), School of Nursing, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Prof. Egas

Moniz, 1600-190 Lisbon, Portugal; Environmental Health Institute (ISAMB), Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon,

Portugal; orcid.org/0000-0003-0288-6653

3 Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), School of Nursing of Coimbra, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal; Nursing Research, Innovation

and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), School of Nursing, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Prof. Egas Moniz, 1600-190 Lisbon, Portugal;

orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-6548

4 Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), School of Nursing, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Prof. Egas

Moniz, 1600-190 Lisbon, Portugal; Environmental Health Institute (ISAMB), Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon,

Portugal; Laboratory for Sustainable Land Use and Ecosystem Services (TERRA), 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal; orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-4402

*Corresponding author: susana.sul@campus.esel.pt

Abstract

Introduction

Co-design has emerged as a critical strategy in the development of person-centred health interventions. In the

context of social prescribing (SP), the involvement of target users and local actors may enhance relevance,

acceptability, and long-term impact. Yet, its practical application in SP interventions remains underexplored.

Objective

To analyze the extent and nature of co-design practices in SP interventions for middle-aged and older adults,

based on secondary findings from a systematic review.

Methods

This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA methodological guidelines. The research question

guiding the study was: “Are social prescribing interventions effective in promoting quality of life among adults

aged 55 years and older?”. Seven databases and repositories were searched using controlled vocabulary (e.g.,

MeSH) and free-text terms related to social prescribing, quality of life, self-efficacy, social support, and middle-

aged or older populations. Search terms were combined using Boolean operators (AND, OR). Language filters

were applied (English and Portuguese), and the time frame was limited to January 2016 through December

2024. Eligible study designs included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, and

observational studies. Grey literature was also considered to reduce publication bias. Inclusion criteria

comprised studies involving participants aged ≥55 years, evaluating social prescribing interventions, and

reporting at least one of the following outcomes: quality of life, self-efficacy, or social support. Studies without

original empirical data, not meeting the age criterion, or not assessing relevant outcomes were excluded. In

addition to primary outcomes, data were extracted on the stakeholders involved in co-design strategies,

followed by a narrative synthesis of the findings.

Results

Among the seven included studies involving intervention implementation, the degree of co-design varied

considerably, five explicitly reported co-design elements. The targeted participants took part in design processes

in four studies, primarily through interviews or prototype feedback. Healthcare professionals and community

organizations were involved in several cases, although often in supporting roles. Only one study referenced

policy-level engagement, and two studies did not report any actors involvement. Overall, there was wide

variability in how co-design was conceptualized and implemented, ranging from minimal consultation to

structured participatory processes.

Conclusion

Although co-design is increasingly recognized in theory, its integration into SP practice remains inconsistent.

Many interventions lack robust mechanisms for engaging older adults and local stakeholders in early

development stages. Strengthening participatory methods and fostering multi-actor collaboration could

Abstract

Pensar Enfermagem / v.30 n.Sup / Jan-Dec 2026 / DOI: 10.71861/pensarenf.v30iSup.489 / e00489

increase intervention alignment with community needs and improve sustainability. These findings underscore

the relevance of co-design to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3 (Good Health

and Well-being), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals), by

promoting inclusive, place-based, and intersectoral approaches in nursing innovation.

Keywords

Social Prescribing, Participatory Design, Community Participation, Aging, Systematic Reviews as Topic,

Sustainable Development Goals.

References

1. Thomas G, Lynch M, Spencer LH. A systematic review to examine the evidence in developing social

prescribing interventions that apply a co‑productive, co‑designed approach to improve well‑being outcomes in

a community setting. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jun 05]; 18(8): 3896. Available

from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3896

2. Morris D, Thomas P, Ridley J. Community‑enhanced social prescribing: integrating community in policy and

practice. Int J Community Well‑Being [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 May 09]; (5): 179‑95. Available from:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42413-020-00080-9

3. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development [Internet]. New

York: United Nations; 2015 [cited 2025 Jun 18]. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

4. Panagioti M, Reeves D, Meacock R, Walker S, Small N, Kontopantelis E, et al. Is telephone health coaching

a useful population health strategy for supporting older people with multimorbidity? An evaluation of reach,

effectiveness and cost-effectiveness using a ‘trial within a cohort’. BMC Med [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 May

16]; 16(1): 80. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-018-1051-5

5. Kiely B, Murphy AW, Keane M, Corrigan D, Molloy GJ, Phelan D, et al. An exploratory randomised trial

investigating feasibility, potential impact and cost effectiveness of link workers for people living with

multimorbidity attending general practices in deprived urban communities. BMC Prim Care [Internet]. 2024

[cited 2025 Jun 17]; 25(1): 233. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-024-02482-

6. Wong AKC, Wong FKY, Chang K. Effectiveness of a community-based self-care promoting program for

community-dwelling older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 May

06]; 48(6): 852–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31437272/

7. Munford LA, Panagioti M, Bower P, Skevington SM. Community asset participation and social medicine

increases qualities of life. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jun 27]; (259): 113149. Available from:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32603958/

8. Gustafson DH Sr, McTavish FM, Chih MY, Atwood AK, Johnson RA, Boyle MG, et al. Effect of an eHealth

intervention on older adults' quality of life and health-related outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. J Gen Intern

Med [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 May 06]; 37(3): 521–30. Available from:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34100234/

9. Coll-Planas L, Carbó-Cardeña A, Jansson A, Dostálová V, Bartova A, Rautiainen L, et al. Nature-based

social interventions to address loneliness among vulnerable populations: a common study protocol for three

related randomized controlled trials in Barcelona, Helsinki, and Prague within the RECETAS European project.

BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jun 27]; 24(172): 1-15. Available from:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-023-17547-x

10. Moffatt S, Steer M, Lawson S, Penn L. Impact of a social prescribing intervention in north east England on

adults with type 2 diabetes: the SPRING_NE multimethod study. Public Health Res [Internet]. 2023 [cited

2025 Jun 28]; 11(2): 1–185. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37254700/